Cricket News

Former chairman criticizes PCB’s mishandling of Umar Akmal case

Former chairman criticises the PCB for mishandling the Umar Akmal case.

Former Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Khalid Mehmood, while speaking to Daily Express, opened up about the recent match-fixing troubles storming Pakistan cricket.

Pakistan’s Umar Akmal was handed a 3-year-ban for breaching Article 2.4.4 of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB)’s Anti-Corruption code. The middle-order batsman had failed to report corrupt approaches made to him and was suspended just before the start of the inconclusive Pakistan Super League (PSL) Season 5.

Khalid Mehmood has advised the PCB to take legal action against the bookie, who reached out to Umar in the first place.

“Umar Akmal got banned because he failed to report an approach by a bookie. There should be action taken against the bookie as well. I don’t understand why PCB has a soft spot for bookies,” said Mehmood.

“PCB’s legal advisor Taffazul Rizvi gave a very odd explanation regarding not having the authority to take action against the bookies. If someone steals something from PCB, will the board say the same thing? They will go to the police and lodge an FIR. Then why can’t the PCB take action against the bookies by lodging a complaint with the Federal Investigation Agency. If some PCB officials are also involved with bookies, then this is a very dangerous thing. The people who control the fixers should also be punished. It is failure of the board to just punish the cricketers and not take any action against the bookies,” he added.

Former Pakistan batsman Saleem Malik recently stepped come forward and denied his involvement in match-fixing, reiterating that he was cleared by a Lahore Civil Court in 2008. However, the former PCB chairman is not buying what Malik has to say in his defense.

“There was strong evidence against Saleem Malik in the Justice Qayyum report. Australian cricketers Shane Warne and Mark Waugh had also admitted that Malik had offered them money to lose the 1994 Karachi Test match. There was a long list of cricketers and bookies who testified against Malik,” he said.

“If Malik was innocent, then why didn’t he go to the court then? During the investigation, Malik had nothing to defend himself with and used to claim that someone was conspiring against him, which was nonsense. The reason why he got cleared eight years later was because PCB didn’t provide evidence in the court,” Mehmood added.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top